Presuming that Lee Siegel is correct in his assumptions, then his new critique of the Internet, Against the Machine, may be a valuable piece in our understanding of where we are and what we are doing to ourselves with our seemingly compulsive use of computers.  He claims we our now actively selling ourselves, prosuming, he calls it.   And I can’t argue with the fact that much of what I read in blogs is a commodification of the writer’s life.  After all, what is Google’s Adsense but an algorithm designed to place contextually correct advertising right next to what the blogger is posting.  Commercializing the commodification, so to speak.  Page views, visitor counts, and finally, subscribers have become a new way of measuring our self worth.

Three examples of this sit fresh in my mind.  Last night, our young niece sat on our couch her eyes locked into the text she was messaging while T sat next to her and had a one-sided conversation.  Two days ago, a blogger I’ve been reading occasionally at  suddenly announced that he had taken a new job that he got because he was able to use his blog as a demonstration of his grasp of personal finances.  Yesterday, before leaving for work, T spent 15 minutes in agony because she couldn’t find her phone.

Are we becoming tied to and defined by our machines?  Siegel contends that this is isolating and insulating.  He contends that because of this we are becoming dangerously susceptible to government takeover or a sort of blind allegiance to a sort of introspective information control.  But this is where I feel he is missing the point.  Bloggers are surfers.  Independent folk who look for the best wave to ride and are willing to go anywhere to find it.  They cross idea lines, information caches, opinions, from red state to blue state, with equal ferociousness.  And many bloggers choose purposely to eschew any ads except those that match their own social, moral, or political stand.  As far as isolation goes, I don’t know any blogger that doesn’t want visitors and comments.

So where does that leave Mr. Siegel and his critique?  He is certainly allowed to have his opinion, after all that is what he is commodifiying.  But I think that he is bringing a narrow view to something that we all know, since it encompasses the world now, is much bigger than just a commercial for ourselves.  His view though short-sighted can help us in our understanding but I don’t think it stands a chance against the machines.



  1. Interesting article and thanks for the mention. I definitely think that starting and getting some kind of readership is engaging yet also addicting. “What if I don’t post? Will they all leave?” I went on vacation recently and, sure enough, I had trouble establishing the traffic I had before I left. But here I am, typing away and trying to get them all back.

  2. rhbee said

    Yes, if there is one thing that a writer learns it is that you’ve got to write in order to be able to. It is easy to distract oneself with what we think is writing. Emails, and notes, etc. but real writing takes time and more time, polish and more polish. Some writers, ee cummings comes to mind, spend most of their writer’s lives just rewriting. Anyway, thanks for dropping in even though you didn’t say anything about what you think of Siegel’s proposition?

RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: